<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: World Tour 2012: Edmonton, Canada – September 10 #137</title>
	<atom:link href="http://roxetteblog.com/2012/09/13/world-tour-2012-edmonton-canada-september-10-136/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roxetteblog.com/2012/09/13/world-tour-2012-edmonton-canada-september-10-136/</link>
	<description>Roxette news and blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 16:53:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raëlian</title>
		<link>http://roxetteblog.com/2012/09/13/world-tour-2012-edmonton-canada-september-10-136/comment-page-1/#comment-50292</link>
		<dc:creator>Raëlian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2012 02:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roxetteblog.com/?p=14467#comment-50292</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of the newspapers&#039; reviews are PATHETIC. The so-called critics use their articles to show their views about the 80&#039;s, but they don&#039;t write about Roxette in particular. I mean: if the 80&#039;s were awful, and Roxette was popular in the 80&#039;s... Roxette must be awful too. That&#039;s what I read in every Canadian review. Finally, they admit Roxette was not that bad or they were better than they expected. I think they should leave their prejudice aside for a while, and write about what they see and hear in every concert. I don&#039;t really care about their opinions on the 80&#039;s (which I consider an amazing decade, musically-wise).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the newspapers&#8217; reviews are PATHETIC. The so-called critics use their articles to show their views about the 80&#8242;s, but they don&#8217;t write about Roxette in particular. I mean: if the 80&#8242;s were awful, and Roxette was popular in the 80&#8242;s&#8230; Roxette must be awful too. That&#8217;s what I read in every Canadian review. Finally, they admit Roxette was not that bad or they were better than they expected. I think they should leave their prejudice aside for a while, and write about what they see and hear in every concert. I don&#8217;t really care about their opinions on the 80&#8242;s (which I consider an amazing decade, musically-wise).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
